场发射扫描电子显微镜观测弱导电金属有机框架材料的参数探究

Exploration of Test Parameters for Weakly Conductive Metal-Organic Framework Materials by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy

  • 摘要: 金属有机框架材料(MOFs)的形貌结构对其性能应用具有很大影响,但MOFs普遍存在导电性差且对电子束敏感等问题,在进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)测试时容易损伤样品,发生荷电现象. 因此摸索合适的测试参数,对获得高质量的MOFs扫描电子显微镜图像具有重要意义. 以MIL-101(Cr)、Fe-MOF、Mn-MOF、ZIF-67(Co)这4种典型的MOFs为例,主要探究了加速电压、电子束流、工作距离、探头及喷金对其成像效果的影响. 结果表明,升高加速电压可有效提高图像分辨率,但同时电子束穿入深度增大,可能导致电荷击穿效应对其表面结构造成破坏. 适当增大束流可提高图像信噪比,但过大的束流会导致纳米颗粒边缘变钝,因此选用0.1~0.4 nA中等束流为佳. 在选择探头时需注意,艾弗哈特-索恩利探头(ETD)和透镜内二次电子(T2)探头所成图像立体感较好,透镜内背散射电子(T1)探头的立体感弱,但衬度较好,柱内二次电子(T3)探头分辨率最佳,但更容易荷电,显得颗粒扁平. 而喷金处理可有效提高样品的导电性. 以上结果对使用SEM探究MOFs形貌结构具有一定的借鉴作用.

     

    Abstract: The morphology and structure of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have a significant impact on their performance and application. However, MOFs generally have poor electrical conductivity and are sensitive to electron beams, which can be easily damaged and appear charge phenomena during the scanning electron microscopic (SEM) testing. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the proper test parameters to obtain high-quality SEM images of MOFs. Taking MIL-101 (Cr), Fe-MOF, Mn-MOF and ZIF-67(Co) as examples, the effects of acceleration voltage, beam current, working distance, probe and gold spray on SEM images were investigated. The results showed that the increase of the acceleration voltage can effectively improve the image resolution, but at the same time the penetration depth of electron beam also increased, which may lead to the charge breakdown effect and damage to the surface structure. A moderate increase of the beam current can improve the signal-to-noise ratio of the image, but too large a beam current will cause an indistinct edge of nanoparticles, so a medium beam current of 0.1~0.4 nA was preferred. As to the selection of the probe, it should be noted that on the Everhart-Thornley detector (ETD) and in-lens secondary electrons detector (T2) a good stereoscopic perception can be obtained on the in-lens backscattered electrons detector (T1) a poor three-dimensional sense can be obtained, but the contrast is better. The best resolution can be obtained on the in-column secondary electrons detector (T3) , but is more easily charged and appears to have flat particles. The gold spraying treatment can effectively improve the conductivity of the samples. These above results are helpful to explore the morphology of MOFs by SEM.

     

/

返回文章
返回